Paper
1 January 1988 Comparison Of Modeling And Experimental Results In Contrast Enhancement Lithography
Tom Brown, Chris A. Mack
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Characterizing the effects of the many variables that are a part of photolithography is not an easy task. As more sophisticated patterning techniques, such as contrast enhancement lithography (CEL), are introduced the number of variables increases. Two tools are commonly used to deal with the complex task of understanding the interrelationships of these many variables: experimentation and computer simulation. While experimentation, and in particular statistically designed experiments, can give a great deal of insight into a particular system, it is often difficult to extrapolate trends outside of the experimental conditions (e.g., to other lithographic systems). Computer modeling, on the other hand, is rather poor at predicting exact outcomes of specific conditions, but is at its best when predicting trends which may exist over a broad or narrow range of conditions. There exists, however, an uncertainty as to how accurately the model reflects conditions of the real world.
© (1988) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Tom Brown and Chris A. Mack "Comparison Of Modeling And Experimental Results In Contrast Enhancement Lithography", Proc. SPIE 0920, Advances in Resist Technology and Processing V, (1 January 1988); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.968340
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 3 scholarly publications and 2 patents.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Diffraction

Picture Archiving and Communication System

Lithography

Absorbance

Photoresist materials

Computer simulations

Photomasks

Back to Top