Presentation + Paper
10 February 2017 Further analysis of clinical feasibility of OCT-based glaucoma diagnosis with Pigment epithelium central limit- Inner limit of the retina Minimal Distance (PIMD)
Per G. Söderberg M.D., Filip Malmberg, Camilla Sandberg-Melin M.D.
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 10045, Ophthalmic Technologies XXVII; 100450R (2017) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2260139
Event: SPIE BiOS, 2017, San Francisco, California, United States
Abstract
The present study aimed to elucidate if comparison of angular segments of Pigment epithelium central limit- Inner limit of the retina Minimal Distance, measured over 2π radians in the frontal plane (PIMD-2π) between visits of a patient, renders sufficient precision for detection of loss of nerve fibers in the optic nerve head. An optic nerve head raster scanned cube was captured with a TOPCON 3D OCT 2000 (Topcon, Japan) device in one early to moderate stage glaucoma eye of each of 13 patients. All eyes were recorded at two visits less than 1 month apart. At each visit, 3 volumes were captured. Each volume was extracted from the OCT device for analysis. Then, angular PIMD was segmented three times over 2π radians in the frontal plane, resolved with a semi-automatic algorithm in 500 equally separated steps, PIMD-2π. It was found that individual segmentations within volumes, within visits, within subjects can be phase adjusted to each other in the frontal plane using cross-correlation. Cross correlation was also used to phase adjust volumes within visits within subjects and visits to each other within subjects. Then, PIMD-2π for each subject was split into 250 bundles of 2 adjacent PIMDs. Finally, the sources of variation for estimates of segments of PIMD-2π were derived with analysis of variance assuming a mixed model. The variation among adjacent PIMDS was found very small in relation to the variation among segmentations. The variation among visits was found insignificant in relation to the variation among volumes and the variance for segmentations was found to be on the order of 20 % of that for volumes. The estimated variances imply that, if 3 segmentations are averaged within a volume and at least 10 volumes are averaged within a visit, it is possible to estimate around a 10 % reduction of a PIMD-2π segment from baseline to a subsequent visit as significant. Considering a loss rate for a PIMD-2π segment of 23 μm/yr., 4 visits per year, and averaging 3 segmentations per volume and 3 volumes per visit, a significant reduction from baseline can be detected with a power of 80 % in about 18 months. At higher loss rate for a PIMD-2π segment, a significant difference from baseline can be detected earlier. Averaging over more volumes per visit considerably decreases the time for detection of a significant reduction of a segment of PIMD-2π. Increasing the number of segmentations averaged per visit only slightly reduces the time for detection of a significant reduction. It is concluded that phase adjustment in the frontal plane with cross correlation allows high precision estimates of a segment of PIMD-2π that imply substantially shorter followup time for detection of a significant change than mean deviation (MD) in a visual field estimated with the Humphrey perimeter or neural rim area (NRA) estimated with the Heidelberg retinal tomograph.
Conference Presentation
© (2017) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Per G. Söderberg M.D., Filip Malmberg, and Camilla Sandberg-Melin M.D. "Further analysis of clinical feasibility of OCT-based glaucoma diagnosis with Pigment epithelium central limit- Inner limit of the retina Minimal Distance (PIMD)", Proc. SPIE 10045, Ophthalmic Technologies XXVII, 100450R (10 February 2017); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2260139
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Optical coherence tomography

Retina

Visualization

Image segmentation

Nerve

Clocks

Calibration

Back to Top