You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
15 November 2017Testing of null correctors by tilted computer-generated holograms with maximum likelihood algorithm
Aspheric mirrors are often tested by interferometer with two different ways ensuring the correctness of the testing result. As the two most common methods, null correctors and CGHs are often used in actual testing at the same time. Considering the accuracy of CGH is higher than null lens, it can be also used to calibrate the accuracy of null lens. However, the central section of null correctors can’t be tested by traditional CGHs. In the article, tilted CGHs are proposed to test null correctors. In addition, we provided an experimental demonstration by testing a null corrector with tilted CGH applying the maximum likelihood (ML) algorithm. The result demonstrates the feasibility of the testing of null correctors by tilted CGHs with ML algorithm.
Deyan Zhu
"Testing of null correctors by tilted computer-generated holograms with maximum likelihood algorithm", Proc. SPIE 10605, LIDAR Imaging Detection and Target Recognition 2017, 1060539 (15 November 2017); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2295528
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Deyan Zhu, "Testing of null correctors by tilted computer-generated holograms with maximum likelihood algorithm," Proc. SPIE 10605, LIDAR Imaging Detection and Target Recognition 2017, 1060539 (15 November 2017); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2295528