You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
30 May 2019A local geometrical metric-based model for polyp classification
Weiguo Cao,1 Marc J. Pomeroy,1 Perry J. Pickhardt,2 Matthew A. Barish,3 Samuel Stanly III,4 Zhengrong Liang1
1The State Univ. of New York, Stony Brook (United States) 2Univ. of Wisconsin Medical School (United States) 3State Univ. of New York, Stony Brook Univ. (United States) 4Washington Univ. in St. Louis (United States)
Inspired by the co-occurrence matrix (CM) model for texture description, we introduce another important local metric, gradient direction, into polyp descriptor construction. Gradient direction and its two independent components, azimuth angle and polar angle, are used instead of the gray-level intensity to calculate the CMs of the Haralick model. Thus we obtain three new models: azimuth CM model (ACM), polar CM model (PCM) and gradient direction CM model (GDCM). These three new models share similar parameters with the traditional gray-level CM (GLCM) model which has 13 directions for volumetric data and 4 directions for image slices. To train and test the data, random forest method is employed. These three models are affected by angle quantization and, therefore, more than 10 experimental schemes are designed to get reasonable parameters for angle discretization. We compared our three models (ACM, PCM, GDCM) with the traditional GLCM model, a gradient magnitude CM (GMCM) model, and local anisotropic gradient orientations CM model (CoLIAge). Experimental results showed that our three models exceed the other three methods (GLCM, GMCM, CoLIAge) by their receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, AUC (area under the ROC curve) scores and accuracy values. Based on their AUC and accuracy, ACM should be the first choice for polyp classification.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Weiguo Cao, Marc J. Pomeroy, Perry J. Pickhardt, Matthew A. Barish, Samuel Stanly III, Zhengrong Liang, "A local geometrical metric-based model for polyp classification," Proc. SPIE 10950, Medical Imaging 2019: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, 1095014 (30 May 2019); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2513056