|
1.INTRODUCTIONThe refractive index n of a material is a dimensionless number that is related to the speed of light when passing through a dielectric medium1,2. This can be seen when light rays traveling from one medium to another bends at the interface. The speed of light in vacuum (c) is approximately 300,000 km/s, while in another transparent media it is lower than and its represented by υ, so that n of a material is expressed as In a practical approach n can be calculated by using Snell’s law3,4 (n1sinθ1 = n2sinθ2), where n1 and n2 are the refractive indexes of the two different media and θ1, θ2 are the incidence and refracted angles of a light ray traveling throw them. By following this principle and the use of diffraction gratings5, the refractive index of liquids can be calculated by using three diffraction gratings6,7, a refractometer based on a sub-micron grating8. Some other methods are based on the interference generated by a Michelson interferometer9,10. In the present manuscript a low-cost and automated apparatus designed to estimate the refractive index of liquids is described, which is based on the sensing of the x-displacement of a refracted ray from a laser source when it passed through the testing liquid in accordance with the Snell’s law. 2.METHODOLOGY AND IMPLEMENTATIONThe developed optomechatronic device consists of a generic laser-diode beam that strikes (for implementation simplicity, at an incidence angle of θ1 = 60°) the surface of a container with the liquid of the unknown refractive index. The beam of light hits the container and refracts both in the walls of the container and the liquid. Once refracted, a stepper motor moves the photodetector (LDR), which is mounted on a moving platform, until the output beam is detected. The total distance traveled on the x-axis is automatically computed in order to calculate the refractive index (in which the entire process as well as the user interface was carried out with LabVIEW and the electronic interface via Arduino UNO microcontroller). By knowing the distances between the components of the system, as well as the thickness and material of the container, it is possible to calculate the refractive angle of the light in the liquid from the final opening distance. For this calculation, a diagram of the refractions of the light ray in the system is depicted in Figure 1, considering the three media (air, material of the container and given liquid) and all the involved variables to work with Snell’s law and trigonometric functions. According to the ray diagram and the user defined assembly, the known constants are the angle of incidence θ1 (starting from point P), the refractive indices of the air n1 and the material of the container n2 (which is considered as 1.49 since the material is acrylic); the vertical segments: the distance between the origin of the light beam and the container d1, the thicknesses of the walls of the container d2 and d4, the opening of the container d3 and the distance between the container and the receiver of the refracted light d5; as well as the initial distance (L) traveled by the motor on the x-axis until it perpendicularly aligns to point P. The cathetus (a,…,e) opposite to each angle (or the horizontal distances of each light segment) are defined now: Snell’s law was also introduced for the relevant diffraction changes of the medium: from the air to the material of the container and from this to the contained liquid Clearing θ2 from Eq. (7) and replacing in Eq. (3) and Eq. (5) to obtain The total distance in the x-axis that the light beam travels is what the system will measure and is equal to the sum of the horizontal distances Replacing Eq. (12) with Eqs. (2), (10), (4), (11) and (6) for a, b, c, d, e, we get Clearing θ3 from Eq. (13) and clearing n3 from Eq. (8) From Eq. (16), the designed LabVIEW to obtain the refractive index after evaluating Eq. (14) to get the resulting angle. The schematic setup is shown in Figure 2, in which the most important components such as: a generic laser source (620nm), the container, the stepper motor and the light sensor mounted over a translation stage are indicated (the complete procedure can be observed in Media1). In order to validate the performance of the optomechatronic device, several tests (35 per sample) were carried out to calculate the refractive index of distilled water, ethanol and glycerin. The obtained data was compared with the experimental value given by a refractometer (ATAGO Pal-1), except for glycerin, whose refractive index could not be measured with this apparatus. Nevertheless, for the latter, a theoretical value of n = 1,473 was considered. These results are presented in Figures 3-4. For the distilled water a refractive index of n = 1,3317 was measured with the commercial refractometer and the measurements made with the proposed apparatus showed an average of n = 1,3347, that is an error of 0,23%. On the other hand, ethanol presented a refractive index of n = 1,3609 and the average measurement was n = 1,3616, whose error of 0,05% is even lower than the one of the fatter. In addition, it is important to mention that the measurements of both tests showed a standard deviation of σ = ±0,012. Regarding to glycerin, the measurements made gave an average of n = 1,4675, with a standard deviation of σ = ±0,02. In this way, an error of 0.37% was obtained For the distilled water a refractive index of n = 1,3317 was measured with the commercial refractometer and the measurements made with the proposed apparatus showed an average of n = 1,3347, that is an error of 0,23%. On the other hand, ethanol presented a refractive index of n = 1,3609 and the average measurement was n = 1,3616, whose error of 0,05% is even lower than the one of the fatter. In addition, it is important to mention that the measurements of both tests showed a standard deviation of σ = ±0,012. Regarding to glycerin, the measurements made gave an average of n = 1,4675, with a standard deviation of σ = ±0,02. In this way, an error of 0.37% was obtained. 3.CONCLUSIONSIn this manuscript it has been presented a simple low-cost educational optomechatronic apparatus that computes the refractive index of liquids inside of an acrylic container, which is based on the application of the Snell’s law by measuring the x-distance in which the output beam is refracted. The sensing of the beam was achieved by a photoresistor (LDR) attached to a platform and moved by a stepper motor, controlled by Arduino UNO using a LabVIEW interface. The refraction indexes of three liquids have been measured: ethanol, water and glycerin. The validation of the procedure was carried out by comparing the results with the ones measured by a commercial refractometer and depicted in Figs. (3-4). It is worth mentioning that the value of this device is lower than $54.99 USD. In spite of this, the average measurement of the refractive index of any given substance is not further than 0,22% of the real value. Moreover, the accuracy of the proposed setup depends on the number of steps given by the stepper motor, as well as on the distance between threads in the translation screw which moves the LDR sensor. REFERENCESHecht, E., Optics, 3Addisson Wesley, San Francisco, CA
(1998). Google Scholar
Malacara, D., Optica básica, 1S.L. Fondo de Cultura Económica de España, México, DF
(2006). Google Scholar
Pedrotti F. L. and Pedrotti L. S., Introduction to Optics, 2Prentice Hall, New Jersey
(1993). Google Scholar
Fowless G. R., Introduction to Modern Optics Introduction to Optics, 2Dover Publications, Inc, New York
(1975). Google Scholar
Larouche, S. and Smith D. R.,
“Reconciliation of generalized refraction with diffraction theory,”
Opt. Lett., 12 2391
–2393
(2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.37.002391 Google Scholar
Singh, S.,
“Three Gratings System for the Measurement of Refractive Index of Liquids,”
Int. J. Appl. Sci. Math., 3 115
–116
(2016). Google Scholar
Durán-Ramírez, V. M., Martínez-Ríos, A., Guerrero-Viramontes, J. A., Muñoz-Maciel, J., Peña-Lecona, F. G., Selvas-Aguilar, R., Anzueto-Sánchez, G.,
“Measurement of the refractive index by using a rectangular cell with a fs-laser engraved diffraction grating inner wall,”
Opt. Express., 24 29899
–29906
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.029899 Google Scholar
Chun-Wei, L., Chun-Che, W., Shih-Chieh, L.,
“A simple and wide-range refractive index measuring approach by using a sub-micron grating,”
Appl. Phys., 106 151907-1
–151907-4
(2015). Google Scholar
Kachiraju, S. R., Gregory, D. A.,
“Determining the refractive index of liquids using a modified Michelson interferometer,”
Opt. Laser Technol., 44 2361
–2365
(2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2012.04.020 Google Scholar
Dobbins, H. M., Peck E. R.,
“Change of refractive index of water a function of temperature,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am., 63 318
–320
(1973). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.63.000318 Google Scholar
|