CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS
Advanced Search
Home > Proceedings > Volume 11315 > Article
Paper
16 March 2020 Value based decision support to prioritize development of innovative technologies for image-guided vascular surgery in the hybrid operating theater
Friso G. Heslinga, Hendrik Koffijberg, Robert H. Geelkerken, Robbert Meerwaldt, Thijs G. ter Mors, Carine J. M. Doggen, Marjan Hummel
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 11315, Medical Imaging 2020: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling; 1131525 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2549486
Event: SPIE Medical Imaging, 2020, Houston, Texas, United States
Abstract
Innovative technologies for minimally invasive interventions have the potential to add value to vascular procedures in the hybrid operating theater (HOT). Restricted budgets require prioritization of the development of these technologies. We aim to provide vascular surgeons with a structured methodology to incorporate possibly conflicting criteria in prioritizing the development of new technologies. We propose a multi-criteria decision analysis framework to evaluate the value of innovative technologies for the HOT based on the MACBETH methodology. The framework is applied to a specific case: the new HOT in a large teaching hospital. Three upcoming innovations are scored for three different endovascular procedures. Two vascular surgeons scored the expected performance of these innovations for each of the procedures on six performance criteria and weighed the importance of these criteria. The overall value of the innovations was calculated as the weighted average of the performance scores. On a scale from 0-100 describing the overall value, the current HOT scored halfway the scale (49.9). A wound perfusion measurement tool scored highest (69.1) of the three innovations, mainly due to the relatively high score for crural revascularization procedures (72). The novel framework could be used to determine the relative value of innovative technologies for the HOT. When development costs are assumed to be similar, and a single budget holder decides on technology development, priority should be given to the development of a wound perfusion measurement tool.
© (2020) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Citation Download Citation
Friso G. Heslinga, Hendrik Koffijberg, Robert H. Geelkerken, Robbert Meerwaldt, Thijs G. ter Mors, Carine J. M. Doggen, and Marjan Hummel "Value based decision support to prioritize development of innovative technologies for image-guided vascular surgery in the hybrid operating theater", Proc. SPIE 11315, Medical Imaging 2020: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling, 1131525 (16 March 2020); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2549486
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
ORGANIZATIONAL
Sign in with credentials provided by your organization.
INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION
PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.
PERSONAL SIGN IN
No SPIE Account? Create one
PURCHASE THIS CONTENT
SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY
50 downloads per 1-year subscription
Members: $195
Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART
25 downloads per 1 - year subscription
Members: $145
Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART
PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE
Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available
Members: $17.00
Non-members: $21.00 ADD TO CART
PROCEEDINGS
 10 PAGES
DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY
GET CITATION
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Surgery
Medicine
Angiography
Image-guided intervention
Ionizing radiation
Iodine
Radiation effects
RELATED CONTENT
Subscribe to Digital Library
Receive Erratum Email Alert
Back to Top