METHODS: Ultrasound data was collected from nine healthy volunteers. Images were manually segmented. To accommodate for consecutive input images, the ultrasound images were exported along with previous images stacked to serve as input for a modified U-net. Resulting output segmentations were evaluated based on the percentage of true negative and true positive pixel predictions. RESULTS: After comparing the single to five-image input arrays, the three-image input had the best performance in terms of true positive value. The single input and three-input images were then further tested. The single image input neural network had a true negative rate of 99.79%, and a true positive rate of 63.56%. The three-image input neural network had a true negative rate of 99.75%, and a true positive rate of 66.64%. CONCLUSION: The three-image input network outperformed the single input network in terms of the true positive rate by 3.08%. These findings suggest that using two additional input images consecutively preceding the original image assist the neural network in making more accurate predictions. |
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
No SPIE Account? Create one
Image segmentation
Ultrasonography
Neural networks
Convolutional neural networks
Spine
Image processing
Surgery