AI-enabled wargaming in the military decision making process

Peter J. Schwartz; Daniel V. O'Neill; Meghan E. Bentz; Adam Brown; Brian S. Doyle; Olivia C. Liepa; Robert Lawrence; Richard D. Hull

doi:10.1117/12.2560494

22 April 2020 AI-enabled wargaming in the military decision making process

Peter J. Schwartz, Daniel V. O'Neill, Meghan E. Bentz, Adam Brown, Brian S. Doyle, Olivia C. Liepa, Robert Lawrence, Richard D. Hull

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 11413, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Multi-Domain Operations Applications II; 114130H (2020) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2560494
Event: SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing, 2020, Online Only

Abstract

During the Course of Action (COA) Analysis stage of the Military Decision Making Process (MDMP), staff members wargame the options of both friendly and enemy forces in an action-reaction-counteraction cycle to expose and address potential issues. This is currently a manual, subjective process, so many assumptions often go untested and only a very small number of alternative COAs may be considered. The final COA that is produced might miss opportunities or overlook risks. This challenge will only be exacerbated during Multi-Domain Operations (MDO), in which larger numbers of entities are expected to coordinate across domains to achieve converged effects within compressed timelines. This paper describes a prototype wargaming software support tool that leverages Artificial Intelligence (AI) to recommend COA improvements to commanders and staff. The tool’s design accounts for operational realities including a lack of available AI training data, limited tactical computing resources, and a need for end user interaction throughout the COA Analysis process. Given initial COAs for friendly and enemy forces, the tool searches for improvements by repeatedly proposing changes to the friendly COA and running the Data Analysis and Visualization INfrastructure for C4ISR (DAVINCI) combat simulation to evaluate them. Runtime is managed by carefully restricting the search space of the AI to only consider doctrinally relevant changes to the COA. The system architecture is designed to separate the AI, the simulation, and the user interface, simplifying continued experimentation and enhancements. The design of the AIenabled wargaming tool is presented along with initial results.

Citation Download Citation

Peter J. Schwartz, Daniel V. O'Neill, Meghan E. Bentz, Adam Brown, Brian S. Doyle, Olivia C. Liepa, Robert Lawrence, and Richard D. Hull "AI-enabled wargaming in the military decision making process", Proc. SPIE 11413, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Multi-Domain Operations Applications II, 114130H (22 April 2020); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2560494

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members: $17.00

Non-members: $21.00 ADD TO CART

PROCEEDINGS
17 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Get copyright permission Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace

KEYWORDS

Artificial intelligence

Computer simulations

Human-machine interfaces

Evolutionary algorithms

Software development

Genetic algorithms

Control systems

Show All Keywords

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years