You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) represent an enormously
expensive technological innovation which has the potential to alter the way in
which radiology is practiced. In a 1985 survey of radiologists and radiology
administrators, over a quarter of those individu1s expected to have some
component of an operational PACS system by 1986. The survey respondants
perceived advantages including fast access to files, multiple user simultaneous
access to films, and possibly secondary benefits in accuracy in diagnosis and
improved communications.
Progress in widespread PACS implementation has considerably lagged the rate
anticipated in the 1985 study. In order to evaluate the current expectations of
PACS and contrast them to the earlier enthusiasm we have undertaken this study
of the current perceptions of PACS among both radiologists and clinicians.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Wilbur L. Smith, Elizabeth Altmaier, Linda Berberoglu, Katherine Morris, Colleen O'Halloran, "Perceptions of PACS," Proc. SPIE 1234, Medical Imaging IV: PACS Systems Design and Evaluation, (1 August 1990); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.19033