You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
25 October 1993Correlation filters assessed in terms of probability of detection and probability of false alarm
Many correlation filters (e.g., matched spatial filters, phase-only filters, binary phase-only filters, etc.) are usually evaluated in terms of metrics such as signal-to-noise ratio, peak-to- correlation energy and Horner light efficiency. In this paper, we compare the MSF and POF using more direct performance measures, the probability of detection (PD) and the probability of false alarm (PFA).
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Bhagavatula Vijaya Kumar, Chulung Chen, James D. Brasher, "Correlation filters assessed in terms of probability of detection and probability of false alarm," Proc. SPIE 1959, Optical Pattern Recognition IV, (25 October 1993); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.160289