Paper
19 May 1995 Error measure comparison of currently employed dose-modulation schemes for e-beam proximity effect control
Martin C. Peckerar, Christie R. Marrian
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Standard matrix inversion methods of e-beam proximity correction are compared with a variety of pseudoinverse approaches based on gradient descent. It is shown that the gradient descent methods can be modified using 'regularizers' (terms added to the cost function minimized during gradient descent). This modification solves the 'negative dose' problem in a mathematically sound way. Different techniques are contrasted using a weighted error measure approach. It is shown that the regularization approach leads to the highest quality images. In some cases, ignoring negative doses yields results which are worse than employing an uncorrected dose file.
© (1995) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Martin C. Peckerar and Christie R. Marrian "Error measure comparison of currently employed dose-modulation schemes for e-beam proximity effect control", Proc. SPIE 2437, Electron-Beam, X-Ray, EUV, and Ion-Beam Submicrometer Lithographies for Manufacturing V, (19 May 1995); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.209187
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 4 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Gallium arsenide

Monte Carlo methods

Scattering

Backscatter

Excel

Point spread functions

Convolution

RELATED CONTENT


Back to Top