Paper
8 September 1995 Shipboard infrared search and track cost and operational effectiveness analysis
Joseph E. Misanin
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
The United States Navy lags most countries in the deployment of infrared sensors for ship defense. The need for shipboard electro-optic (EO) sensors was formally documented in a Department of Navy mission need statement (MNS), approved on 3 June 1992 by the Chief of Naval Operations. In response to this documented need, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (research, development and acquisition) [ASN (RD&A)] directed the conduct of a cost and operational effectiveness analysis (COEA). The COEA is the method used by the Department of Defense to analytically derive and assess capability alternatives that will satisfy the MNS. The COEA team was led by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lincoln Laboratory and consisted of representatives from various military, technical, financial and business organizations. This paper describes the COEA process that was used to define and assess shipboard infrared and search and track (IRST) capability alternatives.
© (1995) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Joseph E. Misanin "Shipboard infrared search and track cost and operational effectiveness analysis", Proc. SPIE 2552, Infrared Technology XXI, (8 September 1995); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.218218
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 1 scholarly publication.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Infrared search and track

Defense and security

Sensors

Missiles

Target detection

Radar

Infrared sensors

RELATED CONTENT

Data fusion: principles and applications in air defense
Proceedings of SPIE (July 17 1998)
IRST: a key system in modern warfare
Proceedings of SPIE (August 13 1997)
IRST ESM data fusion a full silent search function...
Proceedings of SPIE (August 04 2000)

Back to Top