You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
27 March 1996Nature of expertise in searching mammograms for breast masses
Eye position of observes representing four levels of training and experience: mammographers; mammography residents; mammographic technologists; and, laypersons were compared to a random search model as they examined a set of nine two-view digital mammogram pairs for breast masses. Analysis of time-to-hit data revealed that mammographers' training and experience combined to produce the most efficient search patterns as measured by the fastest search times to detect breast masses on two views. Scanning patterns of mammography residents and mammographic technologists were less efficient due to wider dispersion of visual attention that was divided between potential breast masses and perturbations in breast parenchyma. Because laypersons lacked training in radiology, bright blobs in the breast image were considered to be intuitively valid target candidates, and these features distracted search by capturing visual attention.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Calvin F. Nodine, Harold L. Kundel, Sherri C. Lauver, Lawrence C. Toto, "Nature of expertise in searching mammograms for breast masses," Proc. SPIE 2712, Medical Imaging 1996: Image Perception, (27 March 1996); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.236864