You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
21 May 1996Improving SEM linewidth metrology by two-dimensional scanning force microscopy
As lithographic feature sizes in semiconductor fabrication shrink, sidewall shape comprises a greater percentage of the overall linewidth. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) metrology thereby becomes more dependent on geometry. To determine SEM sensitivity to sidewall behavior, samples are cleaved and compared to cross-sectional SEM measurements. Two- dimensional scanning force microscopy (2D-SFM), which uses unique probes and scan control to profile steep and complex sidewall geometries, shows promise as an alternative to the destructive and costly cross-sectioning technique. Repeatability studies on a variety of lithographic features show 2D-SFM capability and feasibility as a linewidth metrology tool, demonstrating less than 10 nm 3-sigma precision. Several application scenarios are examined where 2D-SFM measurements are compared to SEM measurements. The results demonstrate 2D-SFM can complement and improve SEM linewidth measurement understanding.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Mark D. Lagerquist, Wayne Bither, Roger Brouillette, "Improving SEM linewidth metrology by two-dimensional scanning force microscopy," Proc. SPIE 2725, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography X, (21 May 1996); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.240106