You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
24 September 1997Susceptibility of error-compensating algorithms to random noise and nonlinear phase modulations in phase-shifting interferometry
In phase shifting interferometry, many error-compensating algorithms have been reported. Such algorithms suppress systematic errors caused by nonlinear sensitivities of the phase shifter and nonsinusoidal waveforms of the signal. However, in a Fizeau interferometer where both error sources are equally dominant, the most common group of the algorithms produces errors comparable to those produced by discrete Fourier algorithms which have no capability to compensate for phase-shift errors. It is shown that if an algorithm has an extended immunity to nonlinear phase shift, it can suppress the effects of both error sources simultaneously and yield much smaller errors. When a phase-shifting algorithm is designed to compensate for the systematic phase-shift errors, it becomes more susceptible to random noise. The susceptibility of phase shifting algorithms to random noise is analyzed with respect to their immunity to phase-shift errors. It is shown that for the most common algorithms for nonlinear phase shift, random errors increase as the number of samples becomes large. This class of algorithms has an optimum number of samples for minimizing the random errors, which is not observed in the Fourier algorithms. However, for the new algorithms with an extended immunity to nonlinear phase shift, random errors decrease as the number of samples increases.
Kenichi Hibino
"Susceptibility of error-compensating algorithms to random noise and nonlinear phase modulations in phase-shifting interferometry", Proc. SPIE 3161, Radar Processing, Technology, and Applications II, (24 September 1997); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.279475
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Kenichi Hibino, "Susceptibility of error-compensating algorithms to random noise and nonlinear phase modulations in phase-shifting interferometry," Proc. SPIE 3161, Radar Processing, Technology, and Applications II, (24 September 1997); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.279475