Paper
21 May 1999 Performance of 3D differential operators for the detection of anatomical point landmarks in MR and CT images
Thomas Hartkens, Karl Rohr, H. Siegfried Stiehl
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Point-based registration of images generally depends on the extraction of suitable landmarks. Recently, different 3D operators have been proposed in the literature to detect anatomical point landmarks in 3D images. While the localization performance of 3D operators has already been investigated (e.g., Frantz et al), studies on the detection performance of 3D operators are hardly known. In this paper, we investigate nine 3D differential operators for the detection of 3D point landmarks in MR and CT images. These operators are based on either first, second, or first and second order partial derivatives of an image. In our investigation we use measures, which reflect different aspects of the detection performance of the operators. in the first part of the investigation, we analyze the number of corresponding detections in 3D tomographic images, and in the second part we use statistical measures to determine the detection performance w.r.t. certain landmarks. It turns out that (1) operators based on only first order partial derivative of an image yield a larger number of corresponding points than the other operates and that (2) their performance on the basis of the statistical measures is better.
© (1999) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Thomas Hartkens, Karl Rohr, and H. Siegfried Stiehl "Performance of 3D differential operators for the detection of anatomical point landmarks in MR and CT images", Proc. SPIE 3661, Medical Imaging 1999: Image Processing, (21 May 1999); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.348583
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 11 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
3D image processing

Magnetic resonance imaging

Computed tomography

Tomography

Statistical analysis

Image registration

Error analysis

Back to Top