You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
24 May 1999Effect of monitor luminance on the detection of a solitary pulmonary nodule: ROC analysis
We compared the detectability of solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) in chest radiographs displayed on different gray-scale monitor luminance. From the long-term archive of Asan Medical Center PACS 40 normal chest PA images and 40 chest PA images with SPN were fetched into the short-term storage. All Chest PA images were acquired using Fuji FCR 9501 or 9500 HQ and down-sampled from 4k to 2k pixel resolutions, and archived to ODJ with 10:1 compression ratio. Mean diameter of the nodules were 12 mm ranging in size from 8 to 20 mm. Nodules were located within the free lung fields (10 cases), overlapped with rib (13 cases), and overlapped with hilum, heart, or subphrenic areas (17 cases). Gray-scale monitors compared in our study were Image Systems M21P2KHBMAX monitor with 100 fL brightness and M21PMAX monitor with 65 fL brightness. After randomization, eight board-certified radiologists determined the presence or absence of nodules independently using worksheet. All radiologists interpreted the images displayed on low-brightness monitors, then after 10 days interpreted the images displayed on high-brightness monitors. Data were gathered using five rating categories, and ROC analysis was performed. Area under the ROC curve was compared for low and high brightness monitors. Mean area under the ROC curve for low-brightness monitor was 0.8597 and high-brightness monitor was 0.8734. Although high-brightness monitor is slightly superior to low-brightness monitor, there was no statistically significant differences between low-brightness and high- brightness monitors (p equals 0.3). Further studies are required for various other subtle lung diseases, long-term physiological effect.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Koun-Sik Song, Jin Seong Lee, Hae Young Kim, Tae Hwan Lim, "Effect of monitor luminance on the detection of a solitary pulmonary nodule: ROC analysis," Proc. SPIE 3663, Medical Imaging 1999: Image Perception and Performance, (24 May 1999); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.349644