Influence of monitor luminance and tone scale on observers' search and dwell patterns

Elizabeth A. Krupinski; Hans Roehrig

doi:10.1117/12.349636

24 May 1999 Influence of monitor luminance and tone scale on observers' search and dwell patterns

Proceedings Volume 3663, Medical Imaging 1999: Image Perception and Performance; (1999) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.349636
Event: Medical Imaging '99, 1999, San Diego, CA, United States

Abstract

The goal of this study was to measure the influence of monitor display luminance and tone scale on diagnostic performance and visual search behavior. Radiologists viewed 50 pairs of mammograms in two experiments. The first experiment changed the monitor's tone scale from its default (non-linearized) scale to the DICOM Barten scale (perceptually linearized). The second study compared an 80 ftL with a 140 ftL monitor. Eye- position was recorded. Performance with the Barten was higher than with the default curve. Performance with the 140 ftL was higher than with the 80 ftL monitor. Viewing time did not differ for tone scale, but was significantly shorter for 140 ftL vs 80 ftL. The number of fixation clusters generated was higher for the 80 ftL and the default tone scale. The difference was significant for lesion-free images. Median decision dwell times were longer in the default and 80 ftL conditions. Display luminance and tone scale affect diagnostic and search performance when using monitors. Lower luminance levels and a non-linearized display prolong search and recognition of normal, lesion-free areas compared to lesion- containing areas -- radiologists are having more trouble deciding that areas are truly normal. It is recommended that such factors as monitor luminance and choice of tone scale be taken into account when deciding to use CRT monitors for viewing radiographic images in the clinical environment.

Citation Download Citation

Elizabeth A. Krupinski and Hans Roehrig "Influence of monitor luminance and tone scale on observers' search and dwell patterns", Proc. SPIE 3663, Medical Imaging 1999: Image Perception and Performance, (24 May 1999); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.349636

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available