You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
24 August 2000Performance-complexity tradeoffs for several approaches to ATR from SAR images
The performance of an automatic target recognition (ATR) system for synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images is generally dependent upon a set of parameters which captures the assumptions made approximations made in the implementation of the system. This set of parameters implicitly or explicitly determines a level of database complexity for the system. A comprehensive analysis of the empirical tradeoffs between ATR performance and database complexity is presented for variations of several algorithms including a likelihood approach under a conditionally Gaussian model for pixel distribution, a mean squared error classifier on pixel dB values, and a mean squared error classifier on pixel quarter power values. These algorithms are applied under a common framework to identical training and testing sets of SAR images for a wide range of system parameters. Their performance is characterized both in terms of the percentage of correctly classified test images and the average squared Hilbert-Schmidt distance between the estimated and true target orientations across all test images. Performance boundary curves are presented and compared, and algorithm performance is detailed at key complexity values. For the range of complexity considered, it is shown that in terms of target orientation estimation the likelihood based approach under a conditionally Gaussian model yields superior performance for any given database complexity than any of the other approaches tested. It is also shown that some variant of each of the approaches tested delivers superior target classification performance over some range of complexity.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Joseph A. O'Sullivan, Michael D. DeVore, "Performance-complexity tradeoffs for several approaches to ATR from SAR images," Proc. SPIE 4053, Algorithms for Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery VII, (24 August 2000); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.396370