You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
19 July 2000Another look at stepper lens reduction and field size
It is possible to control linewidths on reticles over sufficiently large areas of reticles to provide benefit from increase in lens reduction. For some masking layers, the absolute control of dimensions is better for larger reticle field 5x reticles than for smaller field 4x reticles. The field size of critical layer steppers has an impact on the productivity of non-critical layer exposure tools that must be included in the determination of the overall lithography cost-of-ownership. Cost savings associated with greater lens reduction and reduced field size are greater for 200 mm than for 300 mm wafers. Results from a 7 inch mask are discussed.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Harry J. Levinson, Paul W. Ackmann, Lori Peters, John Arnaud, "Another look at stepper lens reduction and field size," Proc. SPIE 4066, Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology VII, (19 July 2000); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.392048