You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
22 January 2001Comparison study between stepper (5x) and scanner (4x) for gate CD control using total process-proximity-based correction
DUV scanner (4x) gate CD control was evaluated and compared with that of DUV stepper (5x) under the concept of total process proximity based correction (TPPC), merging all the process step error correction from mask fabrication to wafer etch process. We found that different iso-dense bias should be applied in the case of scanner. This is mainly caused by different optical proximity effect (DI-mask CD), that is, scanner shows nearly constant optical proximity effect regardless of the size of pattern CD while that of stepper is strongly dependent upon the size of pattern CD. Application of the concept of TPPC in DUV scanner enabled us to control FI CD within specification. A correction rule table was experimentally obtained using TPPC concept. Process capability of controlling gate CD in DRAM fabrication should be improved by this method.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Byung-Ho Nam, Dong-Seok Kim, Byung-Jin Cho, Nam-Ki Seok, Jae Kwan Jeong, Sang-Pye Kim, Sang-Woo Kang, Young Ju Hwang, Young Jin Song, "Comparison study between stepper (5x) and scanner (4x) for gate CD control using total process-proximity-based correction," Proc. SPIE 4186, 20th Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology, (22 January 2001); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.410760