You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
26 June 2001Establishing perceptual limits for medical image compression
The acceptance and uptake of the use of lossy compression for medical digital images depends on the reliable determination of limits on the loss of visual information, which would not adversely affect utility of the images for radiologists. A lack of widely accepted thresholds determining acceptable loss for various image modalities and for different compression techniques, motivates a need for further evidence of observer performance in such cases, via comparative studies. This paper contributes results of subjective testing for perceived image quality over three different image modality collections, using test sets of 5 images from each collection compressed by conventional lossy JPEG and by wavelet techniques at 4 different compression quality settings, presented independently to 4 radiologists for viewing. The results indicate a smooth decrease in perceived image quality in all three modalities when the compression quality setting was decreased, which implies there is some intrinsic difficulty in establishing a fixed ideal compression threshold within a modality. Furthermore, substantial differences were observed in the compression quality settings at which perceived absolute image quality was judged to be similar, across the three modalities. The results also indicate that the perceived image quality was usually slightly higher for wavelet compressed images than for JPEG compressed images, at a given compression quality setting.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Anthony John Maeder, Mohamed Deriche, "Establishing perceptual limits for medical image compression," Proc. SPIE 4324, Medical Imaging 2001: Image Perception and Performance, (26 June 2001); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.431189