You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
26 June 2001Evaluating imaging systems in the absence of truth: a comparison of ROC and mixture distribution analysis in computer-aided diagnosis in mammography
A rigorous ROC analysis requires independent proof of cases that cannot be obtained in many practical clinical situations. An alternative is measurement of diagnostic reliability as relative percent agreement (RPA). A large set of mammograms read with and without computer aided diagnosis (CAD) was used to compare the ROC area (Az) using proof and RPA using agreement. A subset of 767 (416 normal and 351 abnormal) cases read by 5 generalists and 5 mammographers was selected from the readings on 900 proved mammograms read with and without CAD. The Az was calculated using the multireader-multicase (MRMC) method. The RPA was calculated from a mixture distribution analysis (MDA) using the EM algorithm. Individual reader values were calculated by a jackknife procedure. With and without CAD the Az was .90 and .88 for the mammographers (p equals .04) and .87 and .86 for the generalists (p equals .5). The RPA was 90 and 83 for mammographers (p equals .08) and 82 and 85 for generalists (p equals .3). The correlation between Az and RPA was 0.6. The larger variance of the RPA decreases statistical power. The MDA may be a useful method for comparing imaging modalities in clinical studies where definitive proof cannot be obtained.
Harold L. Kundel,Marcia Polansky, andMegan Phelan
"Evaluating imaging systems in the absence of truth: a comparison of ROC and mixture distribution analysis in computer-aided diagnosis in mammography", Proc. SPIE 4324, Medical Imaging 2001: Image Perception and Performance, (26 June 2001); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.431183
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Harold L. Kundel, Marcia Polansky, Megan Phelan, "Evaluating imaging systems in the absence of truth: a comparison of ROC and mixture distribution analysis in computer-aided diagnosis in mammography," Proc. SPIE 4324, Medical Imaging 2001: Image Perception and Performance, (26 June 2001); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.431183