You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
18 October 2001Comparison of belief functions and voting method for fusion of mine detection sensors
Nada Milisavljevic,1 Sebastiaan P. van den Broek,2 Isabelle Bloch,3 Piet B. W. Schwering,2 Henk A. Lensen,2 Marc P. J. Acheroy4
1Royal Military Academy and Ecole Nationale Superieure des Telecommunications (Belgium) 2TNO (Netherlands) 3Ecole Nationale Superieure des Telecommunications (France) 4Royal Military Academy (Belgium)
In this paper, two methods for fusion of mine detection sensors are presented, based on belief functions and on voting procedures, respectively. Their application is illustrated and compared on a real multisensor data set collected at the TNO test facilities under the HOM-2000 project. This set contains data acquired by metal detector, infrared camera and ground penetrating radar. The data acquisition and preprocessing are briefly described. For some typical cases presented in this data set, the characteristics extracted and used by both methods are discussed, as well as the answers given by each method and possible causes of potential differences in results. Also, it is shown how the different voting schemes compare to belief functions modeling in various situations, based on the knowledge that is put into the belief functions. Since the roots of the two methods are different, i.e. belief functions involve expert knowledge while voting is a simple approach, the explanations involve these differences. Problems that arise when comparing and evaluating different methods are also addressed. Finally, it is shown that both of the methods have their advantages and drawbacks, depending on the measurement and operational conditions. This paper is a result of a joint work at three European institutions towards a common goal: humanitarian demining.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Nada Milisavljevic, Sebastiaan P. van den Broek, Isabelle Bloch, Piet B. W. Schwering, Henk A. Lensen, Marc P. J. Acheroy, "Comparison of belief functions and voting method for fusion of mine detection sensors," Proc. SPIE 4394, Detection and Remediation Technologies for Mines and Minelike Targets VI, (18 October 2001); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.445430