You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
8 November 2001Loss mechanisms in supermirror neutron guides
Supermirror neutron guides have become a standard solution to transport neutrons from the source to the instruments. The performance of the guides depends strongly on the reflectivity of the coating, the waviness of the substrate, and the alignment of the guide elements. We have performed Monte Carlo simulations in order to quantify these influences for non-perfect, real neutron guides and to compare the importance of the different loss mechanisms. The importance of a good reflectivity was demonstrated in previous publications and is supported by our investigations. We show that the waviness of the substrate can easily be compensated by increasing the critical angle of reflection without degrading the divergence of the outgoing neutron beam. For geometrical imperfections such as off-sets of the individual guide elements or deviations from an exact rectangular guide cross section, the degradation of the neutron flux at the end of a neutron guide corresponds roughly to the proportion of the cross section affected by these imperfections to the total guide cross section.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Peter M. Allenspach, Peter Boeni, Kim Lefmann, "Loss mechanisms in supermirror neutron guides," Proc. SPIE 4509, Neutron Optics, (8 November 2001); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.448070