Paper
1 August 2002 Comparative evaluation of e-beam sensitive chemically amplified resists for mask making
Mathias Irmscher, Dirk Beyer, Joerg Butschke, Chris Constantine, Thomas Hoffmann, Corinna Koepernik, Christian Krauss, Bernd Leibold, Florian Letzkus, Dietmar Mueller, Reinhard Springer, Peter Voehringer
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Positive tone chemically amplified resists CAP209, EP012M (TOK), KRS-XE (JSR) and FEP171 (Fuji) were evaluated for mask making. The investigations were performed on an advanced tool set comprising of a Steag coater ASR5000, Steag developer ASP5000, 50kV e-beam writer Leica SB350, UNAXIS MASK ETCHER III , STS ICP silicon etcher and a CD-SEM KLA8100. We investigated and compared resolution, sensitivity, resist slope, dark field loss, CD-uniformity, line edge roughness, and etch resistance of the evaluated resists. Furthermore, the influence of post coating delay, post exposure delay and other process parameters on the resist performance was determined.
© (2002) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Mathias Irmscher, Dirk Beyer, Joerg Butschke, Chris Constantine, Thomas Hoffmann, Corinna Koepernik, Christian Krauss, Bernd Leibold, Florian Letzkus, Dietmar Mueller, Reinhard Springer, and Peter Voehringer "Comparative evaluation of e-beam sensitive chemically amplified resists for mask making", Proc. SPIE 4754, Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology IX, (1 August 2002); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.476944
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 5 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Photomasks

Semiconducting wafers

Line edge roughness

Mask making

Etching

Coating

Silicon

Back to Top