You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
1 August 2002Improved method for measuring and assessing reticle pinhole defects for the 100-nm lithography node
With the approach of the 100nm-lithography node, an accurate and reliable method of measuring reticle pinhole defects becomes necessary to assess the capabilities of high-end reticle inspection equipment. The current measurement method of programmed defect pinholes consists of using a SEM. While this method is repeatable, it does not reliably represent the true nature of a pinhole. Earlier studies have suggested that since the SEM images only a top down view of the pinhole, the measurement does not accurately account for edge wall angle and partial filling which both reduce pinhole transmission and subsequent printability. Since wafer lithography and reticle inspection tools use transmitted illumination, pinhole detection performance based on SEM measurements is often erroneous. In this study, a pinhole test reticle was manufactured to further characterize the capabilities of a transmission method to measure pinholes.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Darren Taylor, Anthony Vacca, Larry S. Zurbrick, "Improved method for measuring and assessing reticle pinhole defects for the 100-nm lithography node," Proc. SPIE 4754, Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology IX, (1 August 2002); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.476917