You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
19 December 2002Deconvolution of astronomical data: what for and where do we go?
Modern astronomy tries to push the observation instruments to their limits in order to discover new unsuspected phenomena in the universe. However, some intrinsic limitations (diffraction or atmospheric seeing etc ...) that degrade strongly the spatial resolution when imaging objects in the sky, and can be hardly reduced simply by technology improvements. In order to get the best scientific return from new, more and more sensitive instruments, image deconvolution methods try to push back these limits. Indeed, when the spatial degradation is known, partly known, or even unknown, deconvolution algorithms have proven to be able to restore an original image that is close, within the errors of the method, to a perfect image as observed by a perfect instrument with no, or heavily reduced image degradation. Many methods and algorithms exist nowadays to solve numerically the problem of image deconvolution. I will review the most popular ones and show their characteristics and limitations. In particular, I will show how we moved from standard methods (which see the images as one unique object) to multiscale methods that analyse the data from a multiresolution point a view, decoupling an originally very complicated problem into a set of problems more easy to solve.
Eric Pantin
"Deconvolution of astronomical data: what for and where do we go?", Proc. SPIE 4847, Astronomical Data Analysis II, (19 December 2002); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.461973
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Eric Pantin, "Deconvolution of astronomical data: What for and where do we go?," Proc. SPIE 4847, Astronomical Data Analysis II, (19 December 2002); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.461973