You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
26 June 2003Application-specific methods for creating simulation masks
Lithography simulation is being used in a wide range of applications to help lithographers solve an equally wide range of problems. A necessary input to optical lithography simulation is the specification of the mask transmittance function, m(x,y), which forms the basis for the aerial image calculation. Various methods are used to specify m(x,y). The choice of method depends, in part, on the capabilities of the simulation software package and the available information. To maximize effectiveness, efficiency and accuracy, users should choose a method of specifying m(x,y) which considers the requirements of their application. In many cases, a simple expression for m(x,y) is all that is needed. In other cases, finer detail is desirable or even necessary. This paper reviews many techniques to generate m(x,y) for the PROLITH family of lithography simulators and presents current research for the defect printability application.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
William B. Howard, Darren Taylor, "Application-specific methods for creating simulation masks," Proc. SPIE 5040, Optical Microlithography XVI, (26 June 2003); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.485536