You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
26 June 2003Exposure field size considerations for yield
Maximized use of exposure fields is essential for achieving high stepper throughput rates and high productivity in semiconductor manufacturing. For today’s low-k lithography, very often lens quality is limiting the imaging performance and can eat up overlay budget and allowable CD tolerance. As a result, decreasing yield at extreme slit positions, is a potential danger. Finding an optimum product field size, considering stepper productivity and product yield, is difficult and often based on non-measurable engineering experience. This paper investigates the effect of lens aberrations on misplacement and CD deviations of two critical patterns in a DRAM cell. It can be shown that, depending on the exposure tool, the biggest error can even occur close to the middle of the exposure slit. Also, model calculations based on PMI numbers underestimate the actual overlay degradation. Therefore, smaller exposure fields do not necessarily avoid pitfalls caused by high lens aberrations or other effects resulting in a reduced overlay budget.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Uwe Paul Schroeder, Gerhard Kunkel, "Exposure field size considerations for yield," Proc. SPIE 5040, Optical Microlithography XVI, (26 June 2003); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.485483