You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
17 December 2003193-nm EAPSM inspection comparison: commercial versus alternative absorber material
Current commercially available 193nm Embedded Attenuated Phase Shift Mask (EAPSM) blanks are MoSiON-based. In order to obtain the appropriate optical properties of 6% transmission and 180-degree phase shift at 193nm wavelength, these films are built very thin and subsequently have very high transmission at longer wavelengths. Current inspection tools use 364nm as the inspection wavelength; therefore the high transmission of the commercial blanks (>50% at 365nm) causes sensitivity problems in current high-end inspection tools. This problem is only fixed by costly upgrades to the current inspection tools, resulting in much higher mask costs. Photronics, Inc. has developed an alternative film stack that obtains the appropriate optical properties at 193nm (6%T and 180-degree phase shift). This film stack has a relatively low transmission (<15%) at the inspection tool wavelength in comparison to the commercial blanks enabling improved inspection performance with the current tool set. This paper outlines the development of new 193nm EAPSM blanks, the processing of these masks, and the resulting inspection performance in comparison to the commercial EAPSM blanks.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Darren Taylor, Matthew Lassiter, Michael J. Cangemi, "193-nm EAPSM inspection comparison: commercial versus alternative absorber material," Proc. SPIE 5256, 23rd Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology, (17 December 2003); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.518069