Metrics of medical image quality: task-based model observers vs. image discrimination/perceptual difference models

Miguel P. Eckstein; Yani Zhang; Binh T. Pham

doi:10.1117/12.536270

4 May 2004 Metrics of medical image quality: task-based model observers vs. image discrimination/perceptual difference models

Miguel P. Eckstein, Yani Zhang, Binh T. Pham

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 5372, Medical Imaging 2004: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment; (2004) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.536270
Event: Medical Imaging 2004, 2004, San Diego, California, United States

Abstract

There have been two distinct approaches to develop human vision models that can be used to perform automated evaluation and optimization of medical image quality: linear task based model observers vs. perceptual difference/image discrimination models. Although these two approaches are very different there has been little work directly comparing them in their ability to optimize human performance in clinically relevant tasks. We compared the effectiveness of these two types of metrics of image quality to perform automated computer optimization of JPEG 2000 image compression encoder settings using test images that combined real x-ray coronary angiogram backgrounds with simulated filling defects of 184 different size/shapes. A genetic algorithm was used to optimize the JPEG 2000 encoder settings with respect to: a) a particular task based model observer performance (non-prewhitening matched filter with an eye filter, NPWE; b) a particular perceptual difference/image discrimination model error metric (DCTune2.0; NASA Ames Research Center). A subsequent human psychophysical study was conducted to evaluate the effect of the two different optimized compression encoder settings on visual detection of the simulated filling defect in one of four locations (four alternative forced choice; 4 AFC). Results show that optimizing JPEG 2000 encoder settings with respect to both the NPWE performance and DCTune 2.0 perceptual error lead to improved human task performance relative to human performance with the default encoder settings. However, the NPWE-optimization led to much greater human performance improvement than the perceptual difference model optimization.

Citation Download Citation

Miguel P. Eckstein, Yani Zhang, and Binh T. Pham "Metrics of medical image quality: task-based model observers vs. image discrimination/perceptual difference models", Proc. SPIE 5372, Medical Imaging 2004: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, (4 May 2004); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.536270

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

;

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE