Inspection and repair issues for Step and Flash Imprint Lithography templates

Kevin J. Nordquist; William J. Dauksher; David P. Mancini; Douglas J. Resnick; Harald F. Hess; Donald W. Pettibone; David Adler; Kirk Bertsche; Roy White; Jeffrey E. Csuy; David Lee

doi:10.1117/12.569846

6 December 2004 Inspection and repair issues for Step-and-Flash Imprint Lithography templates

Kevin J. Nordquist, William J. Dauksher, David P. Mancini, Douglas J. Resnick, Harald F. Hess, Donald W. Pettibone, David Adler, Kirk Bertsche, Roy White, Jeffrey E. Csuy, David Lee

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 5567, 24th Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology; (2004) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.569846
Event: Photomask Technology, 2004, Monterey, California, United States

Abstract

Step and Flash Imprint Lithography (S-FIL) 1X templates must eventually achieve and maintain the very low defect counts commensurate to current production masks. This requires typically fewer than ten or even no defects over the entire field and to minimize template fabrication costs and techniques must be identified to repair defects on templates when they do occur. We describe inspection and repair methodologies and how it can be applied to the imprint template. For inspection, test patterns etched onto the template enable both a die-to-die comparison, to find nuisance defects, and also calibration of sensitivity to different types of preprogrammed defects. A state of the art deep UV photomask inspection system (KLA-Tencor model 526) can detect these events with about 70 nm threshold for imprint masks using reflection mode contrast. Initial scans are made at various stages of the imprint process: the processed mask, after dicing, and after several imprints. The scans show mostly isolated point defects at a density of ~ 10 to 100 per mm². To repair defects, studies were undertaken using RAVE’s nm650 tool which is essentially an AFM platform that relies upon a nano-machining technique for opaque defect removal. On S-FIL templates, the standard deviation for depth repairs in quartz from the target depth was found to be 3.1 nm (1σ). The spread in edge placement data for opaque line protrusions was 21.5 nm (1σ). Trench cuts through lines were successfully created with a minimum size of about 55nm. The repairs on the template were verified by imprinting the features on wafers. The range of depth offsets studied (-15 to +15) had no bearing on the imprinting process and the edge placement on wafers replicated the edge placement of the repaired templates. Trench cuts on the template were successfully filled with the imprint monomer and measured slightly larger than the minimum gap size. Finally, the imprinted wafers were used to pattern transfer features into 100nm of oxide.

Citation Download Citation

Kevin J. Nordquist, William J. Dauksher, David P. Mancini, Douglas J. Resnick, Harald F. Hess, Donald W. Pettibone, David Adler, Kirk Bertsche, Roy White, Jeffrey E. Csuy, and David Lee "Inspection and repair issues for Step-and-Flash Imprint Lithography templates", Proc. SPIE 5567, 24th Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology, (6 December 2004); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.569846

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available