You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
6 May 2005Resist sensitivity and thickness-based beam count optimization for parallel low energy E-beam exposure systems
Proximity effects during electron beam exposure have been kept under control by using sophisticated correction algorithms and software, combined with a strategy which aims at increasing the electron beam energy to 50 keV and 100 keV. At these energies, the proximity effects are more uniform and provide a situation where they are easier to correct. However, as feature sizes shrink, and the pattern density increases, this task becomes extremely complex, since tolerances to pattern definition errors are becoming more restricted. An alternate approach is to move to lower electron energies where proximity effects become negligible. Several programs are underway to develop massively parallel electron beam (MPEB) writer systems that have greatly reduced energy in the ≤5keV regime. Selection of the electron beam energy becomes critical below 10 keV, since the tolerance window where proximity effects are indeed negligible is very small. A shot noise model has been elaborated providing minimum exposure doses required for resists at technology nodes of 45 nm and below. These doses increase rapidly with reducing linewidth and impose a minimum number of electron beams for MPEB systems in order to be able to pattern a surface corresponding to a standard full field 6 inch reticle in a reasonable time, and to directly pattern 300 mm wafers at rates of 5, 50 and 100 wafers per hour. An overall set of results is obtained indicating minimum number of electron beams and electron beam current.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Jacques Beauvais, Eric Lavallee, Dominique Drouin, Andrew Zanzal, Prasad Kelkar, "Resist sensitivity and thickness-based beam count optimization for parallel low energy E-beam exposure systems," Proc. SPIE 5751, Emerging Lithographic Technologies IX, (6 May 2005); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.599723