Translator Disclaimer
Paper
25 May 2005 Initial development of a metric to describe the level of safety associated with piloting an aircraft with synthetic vision systems (SVS) displays
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Synthetic Vision Systems (SVS) displays provide pilots with a continuous view of terrain combined with integrated guidance symbology in an effort to increase situation awareness (SA) and decrease workload during operations in Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC). It is hypothesized that SVS displays can replicate the safety and operational flexibility of flight in Visual Meteorological Conditions (VMC), regardless of actual out-the-window (OTW) visibility or time of day. Throughout the course of recent SVS research, significant progress has been made towards evolving SVS displays as well as demonstrating their ability to increase SA compared to conventional avionics in a variety of conditions. While a substantial amount of data has been accumulated demonstrating the capabilities of SVS displays, the ability of SVS to replicate the safety and operational flexibility of VMC flight performance in all visibility conditions is unknown to any specific degree. The previous piloted simulations and flight tests have shown better SA and path precision is achievable with SVS displays without causing an increase in workload, however none of the previous SVS research attempted to fully capture the significance of SVS displays in terms of their contribution to safety or operational benefits. In order to more fully quantify the relationship of flight operations in IMC with SVS displays to conventional operations conducted in VMC, a fundamental comparison to current day general aviation (GA) flight instruments was warranted. Such a comparison could begin to establish the extent to which SVS display concepts are capable of maintaining an “equivalent level of safety” with the round dials they could one day replace, for both current and future operations. Such a comparison was the focus of the SVS-ES experiment conducted under the Aviation Safety and Security Program's (AvSSP) GA Element of the SVS Project at NASA Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia. A combination of subjective and objective data measures were used in this preliminary research to quantify the relationship between selected components of safety that are associated with flying an approach. Four information display methods ranging from a “round dials” baseline through a fully integrated SVS package that includes terrain, pathway based guidance, and a strategic navigation display, were investigated in this high fidelity simulation experiment. In addition, a broad spectrum of pilots, representative of the GA population, were employed for testing in an attempt to enable greater application of the results and determine if “equivalent levels of safety” are achievable through the incorporation of SVS technology regardless of a pilot's flight experience.
© (2005) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Anthony P. Bartolone, Louis J. Glaab, Monica F. Hughes, and Russell V. Parrish "Initial development of a metric to describe the level of safety associated with piloting an aircraft with synthetic vision systems (SVS) displays", Proc. SPIE 5802, Enhanced and Synthetic Vision 2005, (25 May 2005); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.605247
PROCEEDINGS
15 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
RELATED CONTENT

Application of virtual flight vision
Proceedings of SPIE (March 19 2004)
Synthetic vision primary flight displays for helicopters
Proceedings of SPIE (April 15 2008)
Flitedeck 3D on the MX20
Proceedings of SPIE (July 16 2002)
Low cost approach of a 3D display for general aviation...
Proceedings of SPIE (August 28 2001)

Back to Top