You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
20 February 2006Noise sources and optoelectronics which affect axial detection performance of time domain, Fourier domain, and swept source optical coherence tomography
Techniques based on spectral interferometry (SD-OCT) have recently been examined, with authors often suggesting
superior performance compared to time domain optical coherence tomography (TD-OCT) techniques. While these
technologies have similar resolutions and the spectral techniques may currently claim faster acquisition rates, their
detection parameters may be inferior. This work examines the theoretical signal to noise ratio and dynamic range of
these techniques including time domain. Considering the practical limits of optoelectronics, the often ignored or
misunderstood factors which affect performance, such as vacuum fluctuations, the actual source of thermal noise,
excess noise and A/D conversion losses, were taken into account. Methods for potentially improving signal to noise
ratio (SNR), such as fast laser sweeping with high laser intensities and CCD integration, were evaluated as well. This is
critical because dynamic range translates directly into imaging depth. The technologies are compared relative to the
differences in these parameters. While Fourier domain OCT (FD-OCT) has some advantages such as signal integration,
it appears unlikely that its disadvantages can ultimately be overcome. Ultimately, time TD-OCT appears to have the
superior performance with respect to SNR and dynamic range. However certain positive aspects of swept source OCT
(SS-OCT) leave open the possibility that its performance may approach that of TD-OCT.
Bin Liu andMark E. Brezinski
"Noise sources and optoelectronics which affect axial detection performance of time domain, Fourier domain, and swept source optical coherence tomography", Proc. SPIE 6079, Coherence Domain Optical Methods and Optical Coherence Tomography in Biomedicine X, 60791A (20 February 2006); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.646460
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Bin Liu, Mark E. Brezinski, "Noise sources and optoelectronics which affect axial detection performance of time domain, Fourier domain, and swept source optical coherence tomography," Proc. SPIE 6079, Coherence Domain Optical Methods and Optical Coherence Tomography in Biomedicine X, 60791A (20 February 2006); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.646460