You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
15 March 2006EMF simulation with DDM to enable EAPSM masks in 45-nm manufacturing
One of the enabling RET candidates for 45 nm robust imaging is high transmission (20-30%) EAPSM masks. However, the effectiveness of these masks is strongly affected by the electromagnetic field (EMF) that is ignored in most commercial full-chip OPC applications that rely on the Kirchhoff approximation. This paper utilizes new commercial software to identify and characterize points in a design that are especially sensitive to these EMF effects. Characterization of conventional 6% and 30% High Transmission photomasks were simulated and compared with experimental results. We also explored, via simulation-driven design of experiment, the impact of mask variations in transmission, phase, and SRAF placement and size to the imaging capability. The simulations are confirmed by producing a photomask including the experimental variations and printing the mask to silicon. Final analysis of the data will include exact mask measurements to confirm match to simulation assumptions of mask stack, and phase.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Patrick M. Martin, C. J. Progler, Michael Cangemi, Kostas Adam, George Bailey, Pat LaCour, "EMF simulation with DDM to enable EAPSM masks in 45-nm manufacturing," Proc. SPIE 6154, Optical Microlithography XIX, 61541G (15 March 2006); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.659487