You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
30 June 2006An historical fluence analysis of the radiation environment of the Chandra X-ray Observatory and implications for continued radiation monitoring
Now in operation for over 6 years, the Chandra X-ray Observatory (CXO) has sampled a variety of space environments. Its highly elliptical orbit, with a 63.5 hr period, regularly takes the spacecraft through the Earth's radiation belts, the magnetosphere, the magnetosheath and into the solar wind. Additionally, the CXO has weathered several severe solar storms during its time in orbit. Given the vulnerability of Chandra's Charge Coupled Devices (CCDs) to radiation damage from low energy protons, proper radiation management has been a prime concern of the Chandra team. A comprehensive approach utilizing scheduled radiation safing, in addition to both on-board autonomous radiation monitoring and manual intervention, has proved successful at managing further radiation damage. However, the future of autonomous radiation monitoring on-board the CXO faces a new challenge as the multi-layer insulation (MLI) on its radiation monitor, the Electron, Proton, Helium Instrument (EPHIN), continues to degrade, leading to elevated temperatures. Operating at higher temperatures, the data from some EPHIN channels can become noisy and unreliable for radiation monitoring. This paper explores the full implication of the loss of EPHIN to CXO radiation monitoring by evaluating the fluences the CXO experienced during 40 autonomous radiation safing events from 2000 through 2005 in various hypothetical scenarios which include the use of EPHIN in limited to no capacity as a radiation monitor. We also consider the possibility of replacing EPHIN with Chandra's High Resolution Camera (HRC) for radiation monitoring.
J. M. DePasquale,P. P. Plucinsky, andD. A. Schwartz
"An historical fluence analysis of the radiation environment of the Chandra X-ray Observatory and implications for continued radiation monitoring", Proc. SPIE 6270, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems, 62701J (30 June 2006); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.672233
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
J. M. DePasquale, P. P. Plucinsky, D. A. Schwartz, "An historical fluence analysis of the radiation environment of the Chandra X-ray Observatory and implications for continued radiation monitoring," Proc. SPIE 6270, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems, 62701J (30 June 2006); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.672233