You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
Managing instrumentation projects, large or small, involves a number of common challenges-defining what
is needed, desiging a system to provide it, producing it in an economical way, and putting it into service
expeditiously. Doing these things in a university environoment provides unique challenges and opportunities
not obtaining in the environment of large projects at NASA or national labs. I address this topic from the
viewpoint of knowledge of two such projects, the development of OAO-2 at the University of Wisconsin and the
relocation of Fairborn Observatory to the Patagonia Mountains in Arizona, as well as my own developemnt of
the Tennessee State 2-m Automatic Spectroscopic Telescope. For the university environment, I argue for a more
traditional management style that relies on more informal techniques than those used in large-scale projects
conducted by big bureaucratic institutions. This style identifies what tasks are really necessary and eliminates
as much wasteful overhead as possible. I discuss many of the formalities used in project management, such
as formal reviews (PDR, CDR, etc.) and Gantt charts, and propose other ways of acheving the same results
more effectively. The university environment acutely requires getting the right people to do the project, both
in terms of their individual personalities, motivation, and technical skills but also in terms of their ability to
get on with one another. Two critical challenges confronting those doing such projects in universities are 1)
keeping the contractors on task (the major challenge to anyone doing project management) and 2) dealing with
the purchasing systems in such institutions.
Joel A. Eaton
"Project management at a university", Proc. SPIE 6271, Modeling, Systems Engineering, and Project Management for Astronomy II, 627105 (27 June 2006); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.669722
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Joel A. Eaton, "Project management at a university," Proc. SPIE 6271, Modeling, Systems Engineering, and Project Management for Astronomy II, 627105 (27 June 2006); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.669722