Comparison of computer versus manual determination of pulmonary nodule volumes in CT scans

Alberto M. Biancardi; Anthony P. Reeves; Artit C. Jirapatnakul; Tatiyana Apanasovitch; David Yankelevitz; Claudia I. Henschke

doi:10.1117/12.771071

1 April 2008 Comparison of computer versus manual determination of pulmonary nodule volumes in CT scans

Alberto M. Biancardi, Anthony P. Reeves, Artit C. Jirapatnakul, Tatiyana Apanasovitch, David Yankelevitz, Claudia I. Henschke

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 6915, Medical Imaging 2008: Computer-Aided Diagnosis; 691510 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.771071
Event: Medical Imaging, 2008, San Diego, California, United States

Abstract

Accurate nodule volume estimation is necessary in order to estimate the clinically relevant growth rate or change in size over time. An automated nodule volume-measuring algorithm was applied to a set of pulmonary nodules that were documented by the Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC). The LIDC process model specifies that each scan is assessed by four experienced thoracic radiologists and that boundaries are to be marked around the visible extent of the nodules for nodules 3 mm and larger. Nodules were selected from the LIDC database with the following inclusion criteria: (a) they must have a solid component on a minimum of three CT image slices and (b) they must be marked by all four LIDC radiologists. A total of 113 nodules met the selection criterion with diameters ranging from 3.59 mm to 32.68 mm (mean 9.37 mm, median 7.67 mm). The centroid of each marked nodule was used as the seed point for the automated algorithm. 95 nodules (84.1%) were correctly segmented, but one was considered not meeting the first selection criterion by the automated method; for the remaining ones, eight (7.1%) were structurally too complex or extensively attached and 10 (8.8%) were considered not properly segmented after a simple visual inspection by a radiologist. Since the LIDC specifications, as aforementioned, instruct radiologists to include both solid and sub-solid parts, the automated method core capability of segmenting solid tissues was augmented to take into account also the nodule sub-solid parts. We ranked the distances of the automated method estimates and the radiologist-based estimates from the median of the radiologist-based values. The automated method was in 76.6% of the cases closer to the median than at least one of the values derived from the manual markings, which is a sign of a very good agreement with the radiologists' markings.

Citation Download Citation

Alberto M. Biancardi, Anthony P. Reeves, Artit C. Jirapatnakul, Tatiyana Apanasovitch, David Yankelevitz, and Claudia I. Henschke "Comparison of computer versus manual determination of pulmonary nodule volumes in CT scans", Proc. SPIE 6915, Medical Imaging 2008: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, 691510 (1 April 2008); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.771071

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available