Paper
17 March 2008 Comparative assessment of optical tracking systems for soft tissue navigation with fiducial needles
L. Maier-Hein, A. Franz, H.-P. Meinzer, I. Wolf
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
We compare two optical tracking systems with regard to their suitability for soft tissue navigation with fiducial needles: The Polaris system with passive markers (Northern Digital Inc. (NDI); Waterloo, Ontario, Canada), and the MicronTracker 2, model H40 (Claron Technology, Inc.; Toronto, Ontario, Canada). We introduce appropriate tool designs and assess the tool tip tracking accuracy under typical clinical light conditions in a sufficiently sized measurement volume. To assess the robustness of the tracking systems, we further evaluate their sensitivity to illumination conditions as well as to the velocity and the orientation of a tracked tool. While the Polaris system showed robust tracking accuracy under all conditions, the MicronTracker 2 was highly sensitive to the examined factors.
© (2008) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
L. Maier-Hein, A. Franz, H.-P. Meinzer, and I. Wolf "Comparative assessment of optical tracking systems for soft tissue navigation with fiducial needles", Proc. SPIE 6918, Medical Imaging 2008: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Modeling, 69181Z (17 March 2008); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.769181
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 10 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Navigation systems

Optical tracking

Calibration

Cameras

Imaging systems

Tissue optics

Systems modeling

Back to Top