You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
29 April 2008Exploiting "mineness" for scatterable minefield detection
In a typical minefield detection problem, the minefield decision is based on the number of detected targets in a given
field segment. The detected target locations are obtained by an anomaly detector, such as the RX, using constant target
rate (CTR) or constant false alarm rate (CFAR) thresholding. Specific shape and spectral features at the detection
locations are used to assign "mineness" or "non-mineness" measures to the detections, which are further used for false
alarm mitigation (FM). The remaining detections after FM are used to assign a minefield metric based on a spatial point
process (SPP) formulation. This paper investigates how this "mineness" attribute of the detected targets can be exploited
to improve the performance of scatterable minefield detection over and above that which is possible by FM. The
distribution of the detections in the segment is formulated as a marked point process (MPP), and the minefield decision
is based on the log-likelihood ratio test of a binary hypothesis problem. An elegant, linear complexity algorithm is
developed to maximize this log-likelihood ratio. An iterative expectation maximization algorithm is used to estimate the
unknown probability of the detection of mines. The minefield detection performance, based on SPP with false alarm
mitigation and MPP formulation under both CTR and CFAR thresholding methods, is compared using thousands of
simulated minefields and background segments.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Anh Trang, Sanjeev Agarwal, Thomas Broach, Thomas Smith, "Exploiting "mineness" for scatterable minefield detection," Proc. SPIE 6953, Detection and Sensing of Mines, Explosive Objects, and Obscured Targets XIII, 695317 (29 April 2008); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.779585