You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
31 March 2008Emission polarization from rough surfaces
We revisit the theoretical model for emission polarization from rough surfaces to improve previous models.
Previous models treat the directional emissivity σs as 1- rs where rs is directional reflectivity and s stands for
perpendicular or parallel component to the incident surface. The directional emissivity is based on the Kirchhoff's law
and the energy conservation between incident, reflected and transmitted light. This emission model considers only linear
polarization as it does not allow the cross term of parallel and perpendicular components of Fresnel reflection
coefficients.
In this paper, we formulate the four emission Stokes parameters with emission wave amplitudes to describe the
complete emission polarization content of dielectric as well as conduction media. The emission wave amplitudes are
derived from the energy conservation and are functions of Fresnel transmission coefficients and incident and refraction
angles. For a conducting medium which has a complex indices of refraction, the refraction angle is redefined to avoid the
physically unreasonable complex angle. The emission Stokes parameters are averaged over time and then over the
roughness of the surface. The time average of the cross terms of the perpendicular and parallel emission electric fields is
assumed to be zero as the emission is an incoherent process.
It is found that the emission S2 is zero for a smooth surface or a surface with isotropic roughness and S3 is zero
regardless of surface roughness if the time average of the cross terms is assumed to be zero. Our results are compared
with previous theoretical models and lab measurements and reasonable agreement is found.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Changhyuk An, Kyle Zeringue, "Emission polarization from rough surfaces," Proc. SPIE 6972, Polarization: Measurement, Analysis, and Remote Sensing VIII, 69720O (31 March 2008); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.779755