You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
12 July 2008Chandra mission scheduling on-orbit experience
Scheduling observatory time to maximize both day-to-day science target integration time and the lifetime
of the observatory is a formidable challenge. Furthermore, it is not a static problem. Of course, every
schedule brings a new set of observations, but the boundaries of the problem change as well. As
spacecraft ages, its capabilities may degrade. As in-flight experience grows, capabilities may expand. As
observing programs are completed, the needs and expectations of the science community may evolve.
Changes such as these impact the rules by which a mission scheduled. In eight years on orbit, the Chandra
X-Ray Observatory Mission Planning process has adapted to meet the challenge of maximizing day-to-day
and mission lifetime science return, despite a consistently evolving set of scheduling constraints. The
success of the planning team has been achieved, not through the use of complex algorithms and
optimization routines, but through processes and home grown tools that help individuals make smart short
term and long term Mission Planning decisions. This paper walks through the processes and tools used to
plan and produce mission schedules for the Chandra X-Ray Observatory. Nominal planning and
scheduling, target of opportunity response, and recovery from on-board autonomous safing actions are all
addressed. Evolution of tools and processes, best practices, and lessons learned are highlighted along the
way.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Sabina Bucher, Brent Williams, Misty Pendexter, David Balke, "Chandra mission scheduling on-orbit experience," Proc. SPIE 7016, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems II, 70160W (12 July 2008); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.789392