You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
12 March 2009JAFROC analysis revisited: figure-of-merit considerations for human observer studies
Jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) is a method for measuring human
observer performance in localization tasks. JAFROC is being increasingly used to evaluate imaging modalities because
it has been shown to have greater statistical power than conventional receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis,
which neglects location information. JAFROC neglects the non-lesion localization marks ("false positives") on abnormal
images. JAFROC1 is an alternative method that includes these marks. Both methods are lesion-centric in the sense that
they assign equal importance to all lesions; an image with many lesions would tend to dominate the performance metric,
and clinically less significant lesions are treated identically as more significant ones. In this paper weighted JAFROC
and JAFROC1 analyses are described that treat each abnormal image (not each lesion) as a unit of measurement and
account for different lesion clinical significances (weights). Lesion-centric and weighted methods were tested using a
simulator that includes multiple-reader multiple-case multiple-modality location level correlations. For comparison,
ROC analysis was also tested where the rating of the highest rated mark on an image was assumed to be its "ROC"
rating. The testing involved random numbers of lesions per image, random weights, case-mixes (ratio of normal to
abnormal images) and different correlation structures. We found that for either JAFROC or JAFROC1, both lesion-centric
and weighted analyses had correct NH behavior and comparable statistical powers. For either lesion-centric or
weighted analyses JAFROC1 yielded the highest power, followed by JAFROC and ROC yielded the least power,
confirming a recent study using a less flexible single-reader dual-modality simulator. Provided the number of normal
cases is not too small, JAFROC1 is the preferred method for analyzing human observer free-response data. For either
JAFROC or JAFROC1 weighted analysis is preferable.
D. P. Chakraborty andHong-Jun Yoon
"JAFROC analysis revisited: figure-of-merit considerations for human observer studies", Proc. SPIE 7263, Medical Imaging 2009: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 72630T (12 March 2009); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.810859
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
D. P. Chakraborty, Hong-Jun Yoon, "JAFROC analysis revisited: figure-of-merit considerations for human observer studies," Proc. SPIE 7263, Medical Imaging 2009: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 72630T (12 March 2009); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.810859