You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
12 March 2009Comparison of ROC methods for partially paired data
In this work we investigate ROC methods that compare the difference in AUCs (area under the ROC curve) from
two modalities given partially paired data. Such methods are needed to accommodate the real world situations,
where every case cannot be imaged or interpreted using both modalities. We compare variance estimation of
the bivariate binormal-model based method ROCKIT of Metz et al., as well as several different non-parametric
methods, including the bootstrap and U-statistics. This comparison explores different ROC curves, study designs
(pairing structure of the data), sample sizes, case mix, and modality effect sizes.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Brandon D. Gallas, Lorenzo L. Pesce, "Comparison of ROC methods for partially paired data," Proc. SPIE 7263, Medical Imaging 2009: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 72630V (12 March 2009); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.813688