You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
12 March 2009Effectiveness of computer aided detection for solitary pulmonary nodules
1Carestream Health Global R&D (China) 2Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (China) 3Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical Univ. (China) 4Renji Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (China)
This study is to investigate the incremental effect of using a high performance computer-aided detection (CAD) system
in detection of solitary pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs. The Kodak Chest CAD system was evaluated by a panel
of six radiologists at different levels of experience. The observer study consisted of two independent phases: readings
without CAD and readings with assistance of CAD. The study was conducted over a set of chest radiographs comprising
150 cancer cases and 150 cancer-free cases. The actual sensitivity of the CAD system is 72% with 3.7 false positives per
case. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the overall observer performance. The AUZ
(area under ROC curve) showed a significantly improvement (P=0.0001) from 0.844 to 0.884 after using CAD. The
ROC analysis was also applied for observer performances on nodules in different sizes and visibilities. The average
AUZs are improved from 0.798 to 0.835 (P=0.0003) for 5-10mm nodules, 0.853 to 0.907 (P=0.001) for 10-15mm
nodules, 0.864 to 0.897 (P=0.051) for 15-20 mm nodules and 0.859 to 0.896 (P=0.0342) for 20-30mm nodules,
respectively. For different visibilities, the average AUZs are improved from 0.886 to 0.915 (P=0.0337), 0.803 to 0.840
(P=0.063), 0.830 to 0.893 (P=0.0001), and 0.813 to 0.847 (P=0.152), for nodules clearly visible, hidden by ribs, partially
overlap with ribs, and overlap with other structures, respectively. These results showed that observer performance could
be greatly improved when the CAD system is employed as a second reader, especially for small nodules and nodules
occluded by ribs.