You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
9 May 2009Performance bounds of the phase gradient autofocus algorithm for synthetic aperture ladar
An important issue in synthetic aperture ladar is phase noise mitigation, since phase noise corrupts image quality. There
are many phase noise contributors including, residual platform motion, local oscillator phase/frequency instability,
atmospheric turbulence, and additive receiver noise. The Phase Gradient Autofocus (PGA) algorithm is a common phase
noise correction algorithm utilized in synthetic aperture radar. The Cramer-Rao Lower Bound for the phase-difference
estimate variance of PGA can be found in the radar literature. This lower bound describes the precision of the phasedifference
estimate between any two pulses as a function of the carrier-to-noise ratio (CNR). However, this lower bound
does not account for speckle saturation limitations, present in both synthetic aperture ladar and radar.
This paper extends the PGA performance theory to include a high CNR saturation term which accounts for speckle
decorrelation. This term is shown to be proportional to the ratio of the image spot size to the laser pulse repetition
frequency (PRF). This paper also describes impact of PGA estimate variance on image cross-range resolution. We
show, given a fixed PRF and fixed PGA phase-difference estimate variance, that resolution initially improves with
increasing dwell times but eventually saturates to a level proportional to the product of the PGA estimate variance and
the laser PRF.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Phillip Gatt, Don Jacob, Bert Bradford, Joe Marron, Brian Krause, "Performance bounds of the phase gradient autofocus algorithm for synthetic aperture ladar," Proc. SPIE 7323, Laser Radar Technology and Applications XIV, 73230P (9 May 2009); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.822216