You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
10 September 2009Demystification of Bell inequality
The main aim of this review is to show that the common conclusion that Bell's argument implies that any attempt
to proceed beyond quantum mechanics induces a nonlocal model was not totally justified. Our analysis of Bell's
argument demonstrates that violation of Bell's inequality implies neither "death of realism" nor nonlocality. This
violation is just a sign of non-Kolmogorovness of statistical data - impossibility to put statistical data collected
in a few different experiments (corresponding to incompatible settings of polarization beam splitters) in one
probability space. This inequality was well known in theoretical probability since 19th century (from works of
Boole). We couple non-Kolmogorovness of data with design of modern detectors of photons.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Andrei Khrennikov, "Demystification of Bell inequality," Proc. SPIE 7421, The Nature of Light: What are Photons? III, 74210E (10 September 2009); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.843843