You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
21 August 2009Optimality of pupil-phase profiles for increasing the defocus tolerance of hybrid digital-optical imaging systems
A phase mask at the aperture stop of a hybrid digital-optical imaging system can improve its tolerance to aberrations.
The choice of the introduced phase modulation is crucial in the design of such systems. Several successful phase masks
have been described in the literature. These masks are typically derived by searching for optical-transfer-functions that
retain restorability under aberrations such as defocus. Instead of optimizing the optical-transfer-function for some desired
characteristics, we calculate the expected imaging error of the joint design directly. This was used to compare thirddegree
polynomial phase masks, including the cubic phase profile and a commonly used generalization. The analysis
shows how the optimal phase profile depth is always limited by noise and more importantly, numerical simulations show
that only a finite range of the third-degree polynomial profiles yield optimal performance.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Tom Vettenburg, Andrew Wood, Nicholas Bustin, Andrew R. Harvey, "Optimality of pupil-phase profiles for increasing the defocus tolerance of hybrid digital-optical imaging systems," Proc. SPIE 7429, Novel Optical Systems Design and Optimization XII, 742903 (21 August 2009); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.825119